Neutral valuer does what he can with limited info
In a California divorce case, a court-appointed valuation expert was caught in the middle of a squabbling couple who didn’t provide enough information to value all the marital assets, including business interests.
In re Hembree
In this appeal of a denied motion by the wife to set aside a marital settlement order, the appellate court affirmed the trial court. The wife claimed that the husband did not disclose a number of marital assets and misrepresented the values of certain marital assets. The trial court appointed its own expert for valuation of assets. The expert was unable to value a number of the assets for lack of information including a lack of proof of existence of some alleged assets.
Appellate Court (California) Affirms Denial of Wife’s Motion Claiming Missing Assets and Undervalued Assets
In this appeal of a denied motion by the wife to set aside a marital settlement order, the appellate court affirmed the trial court. The wife claimed that the husband did not disclose a number of marital assets and misrepresented the values of certain marital assets. The trial court appointed its own expert for valuation of assets. The expert was unable to value a number of the assets for lack of information including a lack of proof of existence of some alleged assets.
In re Hussain
Both parties appealed this Illinois divorce case. While several issues were appealed, we focus on the value of the business and the determination of debts against the business. Since the trial court was not given any substantial evidence as to the value of the business, it determined the value on its own with limited information. The appellate court affirmed that value. Additionally, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s disallowance of debts against the business.
Illinois Appellate Court Affirms Value of Business Where the Parties Provided No Evidence
Both parties appealed this Illinois divorce case. While several issues were appealed, we focus on the value of the business and the determination of debts against the business. Since the trial court was not given any substantial evidence as to the value of the value of the business, it determined the value on its own with limited information. The appellate court affirmed that value. Additionally, the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s disallowance of debts against the business.
Golock Capital, LLC v. VNUE, Inc.
The plaintiffs sued for breach of obligations on convertible promissory notes issued to the defendant. The defendant admitted it had not repaid the loans but contended that the rates of interest on the loans were “criminally usurious” and were, therefore, void. Following a bench trial, the U.S. District Court (New York) found that the interest rates were not usurious and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, including an award for attorneys’ fees.
U.S. District Court (New York) Rules Interest Rates on Loans Are Not Usurious
The plaintiffs sued for breach of obligations on convertible promissory notes issued to the defendant. The defendant admitted it had not repaid the loans but contended that the rates of interest on the loans were “criminally usurious” and were, therefore, void. Following a bench trial, the U.S. District Court (New York) found that the interest rates were not usurious and ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, including an award for attorneys’ fees.
Determining the FMV of Privately Held Promissory Notes
Privately held promissory notes need to be valued for gift/estate, tax, and related-party transactions. These appraisals must objectively consider the same risk and reward relationship that we use when valuing an operating company. However, the data sources that have historically been used are problematic. For example, corporate bonds from publicly traded companies are not typically comparable because publicly traded companies are large, diversified, and represent lower risk. This webinar will present a better source of ...
Willamette focuses on wealth transfer valuation
Estate and gift tax planning and valuation issues are the focus of the Autumn 2022 Insights from Willamette Management Associates.
In re Platinum Corral, LLC
The Bankruptcy Court turned down a plan and amended plan of reorganization primarily because only the debtor would benefit from the plan and creditors would be left with little or no return. The court ordered a new plan be delivered to the court as soon as possible because time was of the essence.
Plan of Reorganization Cannot Be Approved Because Essentially Only the Debtor Would Benefit
The Bankruptcy Court turned down a plan and amended plan of reorganization primarily because only the debtor would benefit from the plan and creditors would be left with little or no return. The court ordered a new plan be delivered to the court as soon as possible because time was of the essence.
Valuation of Small Promissory Notes
Privately held promissory notes (typically $0 to $10 million) need to be valued for gift/estate, tax, and related party transactions. However, bonds from publicly traded companies are not comparable because publicly traded companies are large, diversified, and represent much less risk. Note buyers typically discount the outstanding balance of privately held notes to yield a return of 12% to 20% depending on the collateral and other risk factors. Since corporate bonds yield around 4% to ...